![]() |
PROGRAMS
SERVE OUR MISSION
As a young organization, still in the membership building stage, our financial
resources are limited. While that constrains our programs, it also causes
us to carefully prioritize how we spend our funds. A very small percentage
of our budget goes to infrastructure or fund-raising. Over and above some
administrative costs, nearly every dollar is spent on program delivery.
Our programs, both national and local chapter-based, are focused sharply
on grouse conservation.
Grouse Partnership News describes some of our activities. And GPN is a
major component of our outreach and education efforts. We are working
effectively to grow our programs and outreach activities and to stay productively
engaged with the agencies, industry and Congress on a suite of key issues.
Energy policy and development activities,
including renewable energy, can profoundly affect grouse habitat and behavior.
We are continuing to work with the oil and gas companies following the
Summit meetings [ “See Summit reports” ] that were convened
by our executive director. We are actively engaged with the National Wind
Coordinating Committee through their Wildlife Working Group to craft guidelines
for wind developers that will help to avoid, minimize or mitigate the
consequences of such development in grouse habitat.
*Summit Reports
Energy, Fish
and Wildlife Stakeholders Summit II
Energy Development
Stakeholders Summit
We are working with the Natural Resources Conservation Service, colleague
organizations and relevant Congressional staff is preparation for reauthorization
of the Farm Bill. Our goals are
continuation and improvement of the conservation programs contained in
that legislation, with specific emphasis on provisions that will improve
habitat conditions of grassland and sage-steppe communities for grouse.
Conservation Reserve
Program Successes, Failures, and Management Needs for Open-Land Birds
Prairie Grouse Population
Response to Conservation Reserve Program Grasslands: An Overview
We are working with members of the U.S. Congress as they consider possible
amendments to the Endangered Species Act
. Our executive director was recently on a panel with senior state and
federal resource administrators at the Western Governors Association ESA
Summit. The Summit was organized to discuss the potential impacts of listing
Sage Grouse and opportunities to improve the ESA. We are also part of
the steering committee developing a conference to be sponsored by the
Western Governors Association and the Western Association of Fish &
Wildlife Agencies to help members of the sage grouse local working groups
improve their effectiveness and networking.
Our flagship project is the North
American Grouse Management Strategy. We have received
grants from the National Fish & Wildlife Foundation to develop range-wide
plans for North American grouse species. We are working with state wildlife
agencies on the management plans for prairie grouse. Landscape level plans
are being created for Sage Grouse and we are coordinating efforts with
the Ruffed Grouse Society and Wildlife Management Institute for Ruffed
and Spruce grouse plans. The NAGMP is gaining recognition and broad support.
It has received the endorsement of the International Association of Fish
& Wildlife Agencies and non-federal funding from several of the state
agencies to match the NFWF grant for prairie grouse.
State chapters of NAGP are
successfully delivering grouse conservation on the ground. The Oklahoma
chapter is working to minimize mortality of lesser prairie chickens from
collisions with fencing with funds raised locally. The Idaho chapter is
now in its third year of sage grouse conservation projects in partnership
with The Nature Conservancy. Multiple projects involve habitat improvements
and outreach to private land managers to improve habitat quality for sage
grouse. That work has received substantial funding from the state resource
agency. The chapter also sponsors an annual outreach event known as Dubois
Grouse Days to bring public awareness to the challenges of conserving
sage grouse and their habitat. |
| |
 |

The Oklahoma chapter of NAGP, working with the Oklahoma
Department of Wildlife Conservation (ODWC), Sutton
Avian Research Center, University of Oklahoma, and regional ranchers,
farmers, and other private landowners reestablished an annual food plot
planting on the John Dahl Public Hunting Area. The food plot had been cancelled
for several years owing to the close of the state's Greater Prairie-Chicken
hunting season. Partners worked together to plant milo, soybeans, and winter
wheat on land belonging to ODWC. The farmer took 75% of the crops and left
25% for grouse and deer, but he agreed not to cut the stalks after harvest
to less than 14" in height and not to plow under the stubble for planting
until mid-April. Prolonging the time to prepare the field for planting until
mid-April and leaving the remaining stalks 14" high allowed the chickens
to feed on waste grain longer into the year with the added benefit of overhead
cover protecting them from predators. In addition, the Oklahoma Chapter
has partnered with Oklahoma State University researchers Dr. Terry Bidwell,
Dr. Sam Fuhlendorf, and Dr. David Engle, the Sutton Avian Research Center
(Oklahoma Biological Survey at the University of Oklahoma), The Nature Conservancy,
USFWS, and ODWC in presenting a NAGP produced visual program to key ranchers
in Greater Prairie-Chicken country. The program explained the problems grouse
face nationwide and especially what can be done to help the Greater Prairie-Chicken
situation with regard to specific land management techniques in their state.
Most ranchers were simply unaware of many of the things that could be done
to help solve problems that resulted in degraded grouse habitat.
|
| |
 |

Grouse
Habitat Restoration Fund – a private land management
assistance program.
A Ranch for Grouse: The Crooked Creek Ranch Sage Grouse Project
Crooked Creek Ranch (the Ranch) will demonstrate how to plan, implement,
and evaluate landscape level management for sagebrush steppe ecosystems
where multiple land uses and ownerships exist. These systems were identified
by a broad-scale Columbia River Basin assessment as the highest priority
habitat for conservation based on bird population and habitat trends (Saab
and Rich 1997). The Greater Sage-Grouse is an umbrella species for many
other obligate sagebrush vertebrates and other species that use sagebrush
as their primary habitat. Conservation of Greater Sage-Grouse will likely
also extend to cover invertebrates, the myriad organisms in soil ecosystems,
plants, and cryptobiotic crusts.
Funding and Ownership
A founding member of the North American Grouse Partnership (NAGP) donated
monies to purchase the Ranch with grazing allotments that directly influences
about 70,000 acres. Ownership was transferred to the Idaho Chapter of
The Nature Conservancy (TNC) in July of 2001. NAGP and TNC are now partners
to conserve these lands for Greater Sage-Grouse and the sagebrush steppe
and riparian habitats that grouse and many other wildlife and plant species
depend upon.
Habitat
The Ranch provides breeding, nesting, brood rearing, and winter habitat
for Greater Sage-Grouse in one of Idaho's few remaining strongholds for
the species. Vast expanses of lower elevation sagebrush provide critical
winter food and cover. Agribusiness values the same lands and has destroyed
most of the prime winter habitat in the region. Sub-alpine meadows, irrigated
alfalfa field edges, streams, and springs provide needed forbs for broods
and adults throughout summer.
Objectives
The Crooked Creek Conservation Program has five objectives to complete
by the end of 2003:
1. documentation of the ecological conditions
of the existing upland and riparian vegetation communities to provide
a foundation for management and restoration actions;
2. compilation and analysis of data on the distribution and abundance
of wildlife resources;
3. identification of management actions needed to conserve the conservation
targets: sage grouse, shrub steppe communities, riparian and meadow
communities;
4. implementation of vegetation management and restoration actions;
5. development of an efficient and sound biological monitoring system
that measures progress toward meeting conservation objectives.
Measuring success
Conservation and restoration of Crooked Creek depends on long-term effective
implementation of the plan that results from our initial two years of
efforts and adaptive management. Annual sage grouse lek counts, permanent
upland and riparian vegetation studies designed to detect change, permanent
riparian bird monitoring plots along Crooked Creek, and incorporation
of all data into a relational database linked to a geographic information
system (GIS) will help us to measure success. Clearly identifiable positive
outcomes for the vegetative communities, sage grouse, and other shrub
steppe dependent and associated wildlife are expected as a result of management
changes and pre and post-monitoring studies.
Outlook
Although habitats on the Ranch appear to have been less degraded by grazing,
water diversions, and other human activities than on many other ranches
in the region, still there are improvements to the current situation on
the ground that should increase the carrying capacity for sage grouse
and other wildlife. The three officers and several members of NAGP-Idaho
each have 20 or more years of practical experience with the grouse population
in the watershed and have seen its numbers drop from thousands of birds
in the 1980s to hundreds today. We believe that with the protection now
in place through TNC stewardship, the Crooked Creek grouse population
will increase and could become an important source of birds for repopulating
adjacent areas.
Sage-Grouse Conservation
Crooked Creek birds are part of a larger Greater Sage-Grouse population
that inhabits and depends upon this region. Effective conservation efforts
throughout the region are essential if these grouse are to persist and
increase their numbers and will depend upon the cooperative efforts of
neighboring landowners, which consist of the U.S. Forest Service, BLM,
State of Idaho, TNC, and three private ranches in the Crooked Creek watershed.
One of the main goals is to use the Crooked Creek Conservation Program
as a catalyst to develop a unified and cooperative web of activities throughout
the neighborhood of landowners in the watershed and eventually throughout
the Upper Snake River Plain.
Greater Sage-Grouse will never again be as abundant as they once were
but with wisdom combined with required social and political resolve, we
can conserve sagebrush steppe ecosystems with thriving grouse populations
that once again number in the thousands.
References Cited
Saab, V. A. and T. D. Rich. 1997. Large-scale conservation assessment
for neotropical migratory land birds in the Interior Columbia River Basin.
USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical
Report PNW-GTR-399. Portland, OR.
What makes good Grouse habitat?
The North American Grouse Partnership (NAGP) is a coalition working to
promote the conservation of Grouse and the habitats necessary for their
survival and reproduction. Habitat conservation includes 1) identifying
important habitat components, 2) managing intact habitat and 3) restoring
degraded habitat.
Currently there is much interest in which plants are important to Grouse.
The Native Seed Network is working with NAGP to be an additional conduit
for the information they discover and to facilitate the education and
public relations mandate of both organizations.
We hope to learn:
1. What are the habitat requirements of grouse
at each life history stage?
2. What are the plant communities in these habitats?
3. What are the “elements” (plant species) of these plant
communities?
4. How are these elements utilized by grouse (ex: directly as forage,
or indirectly as structural community dominants)?
5. How are plant communities integrated to create a landscape level
habitat where grouse are viable and reproductive?
We are developing an index of plant attributes
that includes direct and indirect value according to grouse life history
requirements. NSN will be relying on the good work of NAGP to provide
this information about grouse.
We plan to organize the information by connecting the life history requirements
of grouse, such as:
1. Breeding
2. Nesting
3. Brood rearing
4. Winter habitat
5. Bachelor colonies
With the corresponding habitats, such
as:
1. Shrub steppe
2. Riparian forests
3. Wet meadows
Landscape-level restoration
We all want to know what makes good grouse habitat and which plants benefit
grouse. As NAGP identifies important habitats, plant communities and species,
NSN will incorporate these components into the standardized National Vegetation
Classification System (NVCS) currently being developed by The Nature Conservancy
and the Federal Geographic Data Committee. Using a standardized classification
system, lists of species can be embedded in plant communities and anchored
within the landscape. Instead of species lists in space, we hope to develop
them within a landscape context.
What is Riparian habitat?
If grouse require Riparian habitat, we can identify types of Riparian
habitat appropriate to a given Ecoregion, such as Low Elevation Riparian
Shrubland and Woodland habitats in the Northern Great Basin. Potential
plant assemblages for Low Elevation Riparian Shrubland habitats may include
black cottonwood/water birch-willow Associations and chokecherry-willow/Wood’s
rose Associations. Ideally, we would like a full species list for these
Associations, and examples of intact habitat for reference.
Where does pale agroseris occur?
If grouse eat pale agoseris (Agoseris glauca) as forage, we would like
to know that pale agoseris can be found in Mountain Big Sagebrush Steppe
in association with Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana and Pseudoroegneria
spicata. Again, we would like to be able to visit intact examples of this
habitat.
Recipes for Restoration
On the ground, plants assemble into Associations and Alliances. These
groupings provide the measurements for assembling species into communities.
The trouble with Associations and Alliances is that they are too small
to map at a reasonable scale.
Ecological System categories organize Associations into larger map-able
units. Ecological Systems compose intuitive “habitats” under
which nest all the species lists for Associations and Alliances. In a
cookbook analogy, Ecological Systems organize species into “ingredient”
lists. Associations and Alliances then provide the instructions for assembling
those species by frequency, abundance and distribution. Together we hope
they will provide solid guidelines for restoration of grouse habitat.
|